John Kerry is not the New Ralph Nader
"John Kerry is a pro-war, ruling-class, conservative Democrat". Tayacan
A letter from Ralph Nader to his supporters on 11/18/04:
Dear True Progressive,
One of the first calls we took after the election was from a friend in West Virginia, who was a Kerry supporter. George W. Bush had been unofficially re-elected.
He was despondent. Do you want to know the first thing he said? “Kerry is going to be the new Nader.”
Among Democrats, 'Nader' apparently has come to mean: the person to blame when the Democrats lose.
In 2000, Democrats blamed me for costing Gore the election—not Gore, who lost his own state, nor the 250,000 Democrats in Florida who voted for Bush.
Is there any question now who is responsible for the 2004 debacle?
Senator Kerry waffled his way to defeat.
Instead of standing with us for a Medicare-for-all plan that is the model for most western countries in the world, he proposed another cockamamie, step-by-step complexity that will dig us deeper into the health care quagmire.
Instead of standing with us for a living wage, he proposed a microscopic minimum wage increase to $7-an-hour by 2007. (In Florida, while the Bush boys were bashing a one dollar an hour increase in the minimum wage that was on the ballot, Kerry said nothing. The initiative won on November 2, by 72-28, while Bush beat Kerry in Florida 51% to 47%.)
Instead of saying we need to reexamine corporate-controlled trade agreements while blue and white collar jobs and industries are outsourced daily, Kerry stood by his votes for the job-wasting NAFTA and WTO.
Instead of standing with us against the war in Iraq, he out-hawked George W. Bush in the first debate.
Instead of standing with us against the invasive Patriot Act, he stood by his vote for it.
Compare Kerry’s spinelessness to his colleague Russ Feingold in the Senate. Feingold stood against the war in Iraq, against the Patriot Act, against the major free trade agreements, and for a universal health care system. Feingold’s supporters wore a backbone on their t-shirts.
As Ruth Coniff pointed out recently in the Progressive, Wisconsin voters—even Republicans—re-elected Feingold by a much larger margin than they gave to Kerry.
Instead of standing with the American people on issues that would win a majority of the voters, Kerry condoned attack-dogs against our campaign around the country who sought to intimidate our volunteers and our supporters and to lie to reporters covering our campaign.
The Democrats spent millions on lawyers who successfully knocked us off the ballot in key states like Arizona, Illinois, Ohio, Oregon, and Pennsylvania.
While our committed staff fought back—winning in eight of 11 state Supreme Courts—the Democrats managed to divert our limited resources into the legal arena and away from issues that matter.
Ours was a model, clean campaign. We fought the good fight. We feel great about keeping the progressive agenda alive.
People keep asking—how are we doing?—as if the corrupt parties and their corporate paymasters would ever discourage us. They have not and they will not.
I predicted before the campaign that liberal Democrats who supported us in 2000 would abandon us in droves this year; sadly, they did.
But in our travels to all 50 states, we have met thousands of active citizens, young and old alike, who don’t give a hoot for corporate politics and are working with us in the ongoing campaign to break up the corporate-controlled two-party duopoly.
The picture you see here is me with one of the many Nader/Camejo supporters we met in Minneapolis. She represents the new young generation that will carry us forward into a brighter and more confident future.
So, I’m ready to join with you to go after Bush on his illegal war in Iraq—that Kerry voted for—which has, according to the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, claimed 100,000 Iraqi lives through October and thousands of US casualties.
Bush’s war is an illegal war, each one of those deaths is a crime. This should be the number-one issue in the upcoming year.
Here’s the rub: In 2004, because of the Democratic Party’s multimillion dollar counterattack, and despite our frugal ways, we were driven into debt.
We have to make up our shortfall quickly—about $500,000 for both debts and winding down the campaign.
So, let’s make a deal: to the first 5,000 "Angels" who send in $100 or more to Nader for President 2004, I will personally sign my new little paperback, Civic Arousal, addressed to the younger generation, and get it in the mail to you promptly.
We are looking for 5,000 donors to help us wrap up this campaign on a happy fiscal note.
Please go to our web site, www.votenader.org, press the contribute button, and give as generously as you can. If you want to give $100 or more and receive a signed copy of Civic Arousal.
Thank you for your ongoing support and bright horizons.
Ralph Nader